Dr. Dan – Making A Stand

Dr. Dan is the man. Is C19 an issue, yes – but the process implemented by government and CDC/WHO – vaccine mandates is morally and ethically WRONG.

The “vaccine” doesn’t prevent the virus nor its mutations. In fact, the “vaccine” will only encourage the virus to mutate. And whom directly benefits from this? Take a wild guess, but big clue, it’s not those whom have gotten the “vaccine”. Take a gander at the latest stock offerings from Pfizer, Moderna & J&J.

The virus that started all of this has a patent chain going back to 2002, culminating in this so-called pandemic. Don’t believe me – look up the patents filed. This begs the question, how does one patent a naturally occurring virus? You don’t; the COVID-19 virus is therefore man-made.

Researchers took a natural bat-born virus that is not naturally transmitted to humans, and through “gain of function” research and development, made it a danger to humans.

Nineteen years of development and OUR tax dollars went into this. This is not “theory.” It is all well documented.

Per Tom Solari:

There was a rehearsal before it’s release:


As soon as it was released and the pandemic was declared, knowledgeable doctors began treating it with HCQ and other known remedies, which were found effective if applied early on.

Here is the point. The next thing that happened was that the medical establishment’s hierarchy, CDC, FDA, NIH (Fauchi and company) launched a worldwide campaign to DISCREDIT these workable remedies.

One thing that they used was a Lancet promoted study suggesting that HCQ was deadly. This was shown to be FALSE and Lancet has since withdrawn it from publication.

The result of this suppression is that thousands of lives were lost that could have been saved by early treatment. Why? To produce high casualty numbers to create the IMPRESSION of a deadly pandemic.


The test that was used to produce these numbers was, and still is, a PCR test with a high cycle threshold, an amplitude of 35 to 45 cycles. It was well known that this amplitude would produce false positives.

It’s inventor, Kary Mullis, has declared this an improper use of this test and the CDC has now said that the test is unreliable, producing overly high numbers for covid and not being able to distinguish covid from the flu.

Coincidently the flu numbers nearly vanished during this covid “pandemic.” And it is also worth noting that hospitals were PAID for each covid diagnosis. So there was not actually a covid pandemic.

Covid exists but is not a problem for most and anyone who gets it can, most likely, handle it with the low-cost remedies stated. People I know are stocked up on HCQ and/or Ivermectin and are consciously taking steps to boost their immune systems.

People who ARE are at risk are those with comorbidities, other conditions, which make them vulnerable due to poor health.


Then come the so-called vaccines. The pharma powers-that-be actually had to get the word “vaccine” redefined to accommodate these injections—which are NOT vaccines per prior definitions—and maintain their non-liability status, for obvious reasons.

It’s always been about the vaccines, for reasons of PROFIT—just see who is in invested in vaccines. And some will say, for reasons of control—see the World Economic Forum.

And here we are going back and forth. The jabs are safe, the jabs are unsafe. If you really look, you will find out the answer to that one.

Here is how I approach it. How trustworthy are the sources who have unleashed the virus upon us, causing a worldwide shut down over a malady no more troublesome than the common flu, and then who have allowed countless people to die by suppressing inexpensive, known remedies, and who now, coincidently, provide the vaccine solution, earning them billions?

I don’t consider those who disagree with me on this to be wrong in any way. Everyone acts on the data available to them. There is considerable “expert” opinion and commentary as to the safety of these jabs.

That said, based on what I have outlined above, I choose to believe otherwise. The bigtime vax promoters in the sky have proven to me that they will lie and willingly damage countless lives to achieve their high-profit goals.

People who will do this cannot be trusted to produce a safe anything.

From Hancock County Patriots:

On Friday, August 7th Dr. Dan Stock addressed the Mt. Vernon School Board in Indiana over the futility of mask mandates and Covid-19 protocols in most schools.

SO, what happened after Dr. Stock spoke? Let’s just say, his speech had an impact. The school board “tabled” their plans and will “contemplate” what Dr. Stock said and make a decision by August 16th. If you would like transcripts of his speech click HERE.

Dr. Dan Stock

I’ve also included the TRANSCRIPT below:

Transcript of Dr Dan Stark to the Mt Vernon Community School Corporation Friday August 7th 2021
Mt Vernon Indiana
Guilty as charged.
Dr. Dan Stark

The address you’re about to see is hard to believe 18 months into this and still having a problem. And I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we’re doing things that are not useful and we’re getting our sources of information from the Indiana State board of Health and the CDC who actually don’t bother to read science before they do this.

I’m actually a functional family medicine physician. That means I am speciality trained in immunology and inflammation, regulation.

And everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.

So things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses, they are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask.

By the way, the literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we presented to you. It’s been given to the secretary.

As a matter of fact, it quotes at least three studies that’s sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact, even though the CDC in the NIH have chosen to to ignore the very science that they paid to have done.

That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you cannot make these viruses go away.

The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter or become deranged, as has happened recently with these vaccines. And then they cause symptomatic disease because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs.

And this is a very important point. No one can make this virus go away. The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did smallpox, where we could make a virus go away.

Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing it learned to infect was humans. That’s why we’re able to make that virus go away.

That will not happen with this any more than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncytial virus, adenoviral respiratory syndromes, or anything else that has animal reservoirs.

So the reason you can’t do this is because you’re trying to do something which has already been tried and can’t be done.
Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this vaccine.

And I would hope this board would start asking itself before it considers taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH and the state board of health, why we are doing things about this that we didn’t do for the common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncytial virus?

And then ask yourself, why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective having a breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don’t do that?

And to help you understand that, you need to know the condition that is called antibody mediated viral enhancement.

That is a condition done when vaccines work wrong, as they did in every coronavirus study done in animals on coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak and done in respiratory syncytial virus where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which why it cannot be done right for respiratory virus, which has a very low pathogenicity rate, causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus become worse than it would with native infection.

And that is why you are seeing an outbreak right now. In fact, in that flash drive you’re going to have coming to you in the emails with six extra studies showing that 75 percent of people who had covid-19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable, Massachusetts outbreak were fully vaccinated.

Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than any person unvaccinated. You should also know that no vaccine, even the ones I support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection.

In 2014, there was outbreak of mumps in the National Hockey League. The only people who came down the symptoms were the people who were unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status.

Boy, that sounds like a great argument for vaccines, but a question that you should ask yourself, knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual, where did they get the disease?

And the answer was “from the vaccinated individuals.”

No vaccine prevents you from getting infection. You get infected, you shed pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens. You just don’t get symptomatic from it.

So you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers that you’ve planned on get better by doing any of the things you’re doing, because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens.

And you can’t prevent it with a vaccine because they don’t do the very thing you’re wanting them to do.

And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance.

And instead read the articles that are coming in the email and on this flash drive and listen to the people in this audience here tonight who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH is counterfactual.

And that’s why you’re still fighting this with this vaccine that supposedly was going to make all of this go away.

But it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of covid- 19 develop in the middle of the summer when vitamin D levels are at their highest.

By the way, the other thing that would be necessary, any vaccine restriction to be considered is if there were no other treatment available.

And I can tell you, having treated over 15 covid-19 patients, that between active loading with vitamin D, ivermectin and zinc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital.

And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 hydroxy vitamin D level greater than fifty five, your risk of covid-19 death will drop down to one quarter of the population average for the United States.

And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that the show the same is true.

So if you were going to discriminate based upon vaccine, you should also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy vitamin D level, zinc taste test response ,and probably previous infections.

Since there are also studies like Flash Drive that show that people who have recovered from covid-19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination at all, no reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization and suffer two to four times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.

Therefore, the policies that you are basing on are totally counterfactual.

I don’t blame this board for that because I know you aren’t scientists and you’ve thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH and the Indiana State Board of Health, but I would encourage that instead, you listen to the people out here in this audience and read what’s on that data drive.

And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that, I will happily come back and sit with you individually.

If you would like to explain the science behind this and if you’re worried about being sued by somebody because you don’t follow the guidance of the CDC and the NIH, I will tell you have a free pro bono expert testimony at your disposal.

I will testify in defense of this court turning down all these recommendations for free at any time, in any court. Thank you.
Dr Dan Stock

In his presentation, he references a flash drive he gave the school board members to review with all of the scientific literature he referenced. 

Click on the links to access the following studies. 

1. SARS-CoV2-Transmission Among Marine Recruits during Quarantine. 


2. Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells. 


3. Vitamin D for prevention of respiratory tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 

4. Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis

5. CDC assessment of non-pharmaceutical influenza methods. 

6. Federalist cases/mortality mask comparison

7. Heritage Foundation Study – In fact, mask use during the pandemic has been recommended by The Heritage Foundation’s Coronavirus Commission guidelines. However, our findings do suggest that public health strategies relying predominantly on mask mandates are inadequate, and thus other initiatives, in addition to mask wearing, should have been a component of policies aimed to limit the spread of the disease. 

8. Declaration of Great Barrington– The Great Barrington Declaration- As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. Over 60,000 medical experts have signed this declaration. 

9. Covid-19 Breakthrough Infections in Vaccinated Health Care Workers. 


10. Calcifediol Treatment and Hospital Mortality Due to COVID-19: A Cohort Study


11. Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children. 


12. Calcifediol treatment and COVID-19-related outcomes


13. “Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study. 


14. Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers


15. Community Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State Mandates In The US


16. Face-Masks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis

17. Infection Fatality Ratios for COVID-19 Among Non-Institutionalized Persons 12 and Older: Results of a Random-Sample Prevalence Study


18. Open Schools, COVID-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden. 


19. Face-Masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review 


20. Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gathering- Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021 


21. Short term, high-dose vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, study


22. Rapid Expert Consultation on the Effectiveness of Fabric Masks for the COVID-19 Pandemic (April 8, 2020) 


Other Locations of this video:

You can watch his 6 minute presentation before the school board HERE on Facebook or HERE on youtube (15:20 mark) HERE on Rumble.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: